![]() What does bother me, though, is the annoying product placement of a certain media-service provider and the overacting of certain characters. Sure, the complexity of the characters is kept to a minimum, but this being a Christmas film, I don't have too many issues with that. The only thing properly executed here is the creative way in which the two characters have personalities conflicting their social status Margaret is aching for a normal and spontaneous life, while Stacy is well-organized. The point is, these two have conflicting personalities so they decide to switch places for two days. She is Stacy De Novo, a baker from Chicago and also Lady Margaret, the Duchess of. Vanessa Hudgens plays a double role here. These problems, unfortunately, persist deeper into the film. The cinematography is also highly colorful and while is aesthetically pleasing, it also feels cheap and unnatural. Seriously, is like walking through a supermarket in December. It is a film supposedly about the magic of Christmas and love and what-not, but the only representation of the best time of the year is of extravagant, cliche decorations. Seriously, is like Mike Rohl's 'The Princess Switch' is like the annoying guy who sings Christmas Carols in November. Mike Rohl's 'The Princess Switch' is like the annoying guy who sings Christmas Carols in November. But that is quickly followed by a sudden onset of tolerance that honestly makes you question whether or not using was even worth it. This movie's like a weird drug where the first few minutes of use are completely satisfactory (in an ironic sense, albeit). Sure, you could argue it's first twenty minutes are a "so bad, it's good" watch, but that's only for the first twenty minutes. "The Princess Switch" is a borderline shameful exploitation of grounds that the romantic comedy genre has already stomped into oblivion by way of the Hallmark channel alone. ![]() "The Princess Switch" is a borderline shameful exploitation of grounds that the romantic comedy genre has already stomped into oblivion by way An absolutely appalling example of why cliches and tropes sometimes don't work - especially when either used too often or relied upon exclusively. … ExpandĪn absolutely appalling example of why cliches and tropes sometimes don't work - especially when either used too often or relied upon exclusively. In the end, this movie is good for people who like RomComs or who don’t. ![]() Also, I’m pretty sure who wrote this movie wrote A Christmas Prince there is a lot of similarities between the two princes. Other movies who have done this kind of plot had a few characters shrug it off but not all. They show signs of questioning it but again like when things happen in this film they just shrug it off. Yes, I know this is a fictional film but they make the characters out to be stupid and not question why Stacy or Margaret is acting differently than usual. And two characters would stand underneath mistletoe that magically appeared out of nowhere. I think one of the only things that bugged me about this film was how everything happened like magic and was never explained.There was a character in this film that just kept appearing at the right moment and it was never explained. Everything seemed to flow from one thing smoothly to the next. I had no issues with the pacing at all in this film. ![]() ![]() For example, you either connect to Stacy because you are the type of person who plans out everything or Margaret who is spontaneous. You can easily relate to either Stacy or Margaret in a way. Nobody seemed like a character but a real human being. It was an excellent choice for everybody and to show how the royalty has better-looking clothes compared to everybody else in the film. I also really liked the costume designs on them. Every set makes you feel like you really are there with these characters. It was an excellent choice for everybody and to show how the royalty has better-looking clothes compared to First of all, the set design in this film is spectacular. First of all, the set design in this film is spectacular. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |